More actions
→Tables?: Reply
(→Tables?: Reply) |
(→Tables?: Reply) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Yes, I understand. I am working on revamping the presentation of this and I appreciate the feedback. I thought it would be easier to view but I see that it having the opposite effect. Please feel free to message me on here or discord with any additional feedback. [[User:Jamazing|Jamazing]] ([[User talk:Jamazing|talk]]) 14:36, 13 August 2024 (CEST) | :Yes, I understand. I am working on revamping the presentation of this and I appreciate the feedback. I thought it would be easier to view but I see that it having the opposite effect. Please feel free to message me on here or discord with any additional feedback. [[User:Jamazing|Jamazing]] ([[User talk:Jamazing|talk]]) 14:36, 13 August 2024 (CEST) | ||
::That's fair, it was not entirely a negative change but felt less functionally usable in the moment. I did appreciate how the tables outlined Pass/Fail approval outcomes, which I see you have moved back into the indented style. I could see use of something like [ +1 / -1 ] to indicate Pass/Fail in that order for a simple one line option. Or [ +1 / -- ] or [ -- / -5 ], etc. | |||
::Potentially a subdued image (low opacity?) with a double dash [ -- ] could provide confirmation of no change as opposed to an untested option. I think I agree with Arikel's comment above on not needing to see no approval change, though. Thanks for all your work organizing this content. [[Special:Contributions/97.126.88.200|97.126.88.200]] 07:31, 15 August 2024 (CEST) | |||