User talk:Hawkeye: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 7 October by Hawkeye in topic Everburn Blade magical?
(→Everburn Blade magical?: Reply) |
(→Everburn Blade magical?: Reply) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:I changed this, because the users "Legios against all odds!" and "Natanielxxl5000" found that out. The Evernburn Blade seems to be magical and ignore the slashing resistance even without having a +1 enchantment [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 09:38, 7 October 2024 (CEST) | :I changed this, because the users "Legios against all odds!" and "Natanielxxl5000" found that out. The Evernburn Blade seems to be magical and ignore the slashing resistance even without having a +1 enchantment [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 09:38, 7 October 2024 (CEST) | ||
::Good call! I just checked the game files and MAG_Fire_AlwaysDippedInFire_Greatsword indeed possesses the WeaponProperty(Magical) tag. [[User:Rydiak|Rydiak]] ([[User talk:Rydiak|talk]]) 10:12, 7 October 2024 (CEST) | |||
:::Upon further review in the game files, it appears that EVERY weapon that is Uncommon or rarer (e.g. not common) has the WeaponProperty(Magical) tag, so this feature is not unique to Everburn Blade. [[User:Rydiak|Rydiak]] ([[User talk:Rydiak|talk]]) 10:29, 7 October 2024 (CEST) | |||
::::Ah thanks, good to know. [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 10:41, 7 October 2024 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:41, 7 October 2024
Party plurality[edit source]
Hi there! No problem about the plurality of "party" -- I'm just stopping by to note that the same article had various other instances of party in the singular (e.g. "party is"). At the time I was just (theoretically) cleaning up a couple other ones to be consistent through the article. Cheers, Cattlesquat (talk) 20:55, 1 May 2024 (CEST)
- You're welcome. Thanks for the info. I think, now the last "party is" in that particular article is gone. Hawkeye (talk) 23:19, 1 May 2024 (CEST)
Everburn Blade magical?[edit source]
Does Everburn Blade actually ignore the non-magical Slashing resistance that Cambions possess? I thought a weapon required at least a +1 enchantment to be considered a magical source of damage. Rydiak (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2024 (CEST)
- I changed this, because the users "Legios against all odds!" and "Natanielxxl5000" found that out. The Evernburn Blade seems to be magical and ignore the slashing resistance even without having a +1 enchantment Hawkeye (talk) 09:38, 7 October 2024 (CEST)
- Good call! I just checked the game files and MAG_Fire_AlwaysDippedInFire_Greatsword indeed possesses the WeaponProperty(Magical) tag. Rydiak (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2024 (CEST)