Talk:Gloves of Power: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 21 January by NtCarlson in topic Probability
(Answer to question) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Does anyone know the probability of Bane being inflicted? It seems incredibly low --[[User:GoingMenthol|GoingMenthol]] ([[User talk:GoingMenthol|talk]]) 15:08, 21 January 2024 (CET) | Does anyone know the probability of Bane being inflicted? It seems incredibly low --[[User:GoingMenthol|GoingMenthol]] ([[User talk:GoingMenthol|talk]]) 15:08, 21 January 2024 (CET) | ||
* If you go to the wiki page for the passive it says it's a DC 11 Charisma saving throw. [[User:Nattern|Nattern]] ([[User talk:Nattern|talk]]) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (CET) | * If you go to the wiki page for the passive it says it's a DC 11 Charisma saving throw. [[User:Nattern|Nattern]] ([[User talk:Nattern|talk]]) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (CET) | ||
* If you want something more reliable, the [[Gloves of Baneful Striking]] have pretty much the same Bane-on-hit effect, but with a 100% chance. [[User:NtCarlson|NtCarlson]] ([[User talk:NtCarlson|talk]]) 16:16, 21 January 2024 (CET) |
Revision as of 16:16, 21 January 2024
Probability
Does anyone know the probability of Bane being inflicted? It seems incredibly low --GoingMenthol (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2024 (CET)
- If you go to the wiki page for the passive it says it's a DC 11 Charisma saving throw. Nattern (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (CET)
- If you want something more reliable, the Gloves of Baneful Striking have pretty much the same Bane-on-hit effect, but with a 100% chance. NtCarlson (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2024 (CET)