Talk:Gloves of Power: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 21 January by HarveyPekar in topic Probability
No edit summary |
HarveyPekar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* If you go to the wiki page for the passive it says it's a DC 11 Charisma saving throw. [[User:Nattern|Nattern]] ([[User talk:Nattern|talk]]) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (CET) | * If you go to the wiki page for the passive it says it's a DC 11 Charisma saving throw. [[User:Nattern|Nattern]] ([[User talk:Nattern|talk]]) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (CET) | ||
* If you want something more reliable, the [[Gloves of Baneful Striking]] have pretty much the same Bane-on-hit effect, but with a 100% chance. [[User:NtCarlson|NtCarlson]] ([[User talk:NtCarlson|talk]]) 16:16, 21 January 2024 (CET) | * If you want something more reliable, the [[Gloves of Baneful Striking]] have pretty much the same Bane-on-hit effect, but with a 100% chance. [[User:NtCarlson|NtCarlson]] ([[User talk:NtCarlson|talk]]) 16:16, 21 January 2024 (CET) | ||
:If it seems as if you're never hitting, it might also be possible that the character wearing the gloves isn't Branded. --[[User:HarveyPekar|HarveyPekar]] ([[User talk:HarveyPekar|talk]]) 21:43, 21 January 2024 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 22:43, 21 January 2024
Probability
Does anyone know the probability of Bane being inflicted? It seems incredibly low --GoingMenthol (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2024 (CET)
- If you go to the wiki page for the passive it says it's a DC 11 Charisma saving throw. Nattern (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (CET)
- If you want something more reliable, the Gloves of Baneful Striking have pretty much the same Bane-on-hit effect, but with a 100% chance. NtCarlson (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2024 (CET)
- If it seems as if you're never hitting, it might also be possible that the character wearing the gloves isn't Branded. --HarveyPekar (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2024 (CET)