16,072
editsMore actions
→Party plurality: Reply
Cattlesquat (talk | contribs) (→Party plurality: new section) |
(→Party plurality: Reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi there! No problem about the plurality of "party" -- I'm just stopping by to note that the same article had various other instances of party in the singular (e.g. "party is"). At the time I was just (theoretically) cleaning up a couple other ones to be consistent through the article. Cheers, [[User:Cattlesquat|Cattlesquat]] ([[User talk:Cattlesquat|talk]]) 20:55, 1 May 2024 (CEST) | Hi there! No problem about the plurality of "party" -- I'm just stopping by to note that the same article had various other instances of party in the singular (e.g. "party is"). At the time I was just (theoretically) cleaning up a couple other ones to be consistent through the article. Cheers, [[User:Cattlesquat|Cattlesquat]] ([[User talk:Cattlesquat|talk]]) 20:55, 1 May 2024 (CEST) | ||
:You're welcome. Thanks for the info. I think, now the last "party is" in that particular article is gone. [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 23:19, 1 May 2024 (CEST) | |||