User talk:NtCarlson

Thank you

Thank you so much for catching that discrepancy regarding MAG_FlexibleArmor_Defense_Passive. I totally missed that it was also pulling "Boosts" "AC(1)" from "FightingStyle_Defense" when I made that edit. I guess that is what I get for editing at 0300! :) Rydiak (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2024 (CET)

No problem. I also initially misinterpreted the

"BoostConditions": "HasPassive('FightingStyle_Defense', context.Source)"

line as granting Defence rather than checking for its presence. NtCarlson (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2024 (CET)

Yep exactly. Being in the "BoostConditions" field it is a check, rather than a "Boost" itself, but your edit was spot on! Rydiak (talk) 18:48, 20 December 2024 (CET)

Staff of the Ram hidden 1d6 Force damage

I can see the hidden status that applies WeaponDamage(1d6, Force) to Staff of the Ram, but I don't actually see it adding that damage to any attack in-game. Are you sure that you have witnessed the bonus Force damage yourself? Rydiak (talk) 01:43, 2 January 2025 (CET)

Another editor in the discord posted a screenshot of it with the 1d6 damage and I also checked in-game and it works. Admittedly, I used cheat engine to spawn the weapon in, so maybe the weapon when acquired legitimately is missing the status as these sorts of hidden conditions applied to weapons can be wonky. Definitely worth double checking. NtCarlson (talk) 01:52, 2 January 2025 (CET)

On my test save this item was acquired legitimately and does not possess the Force damage. I am currently trying to find the local item in the toolkit to check its stats. Rydiak (talk) 02:05, 2 January 2025 (CET)

Found it. It is S_LOW_JaheirasHouse_StaffOfTheRam (f6b9701c-66ca-43d1-adea-2e5b443fa35d). Rydiak (talk) 02:19, 2 January 2025 (CET)

Ok yeah, that's a different item than what I was looking at (MAG_LC_OfTheRam_Quarterstaff) which appears to be the parent template of the ID you mentioned. I guess the StatusList isn't inherited? Either way, yeah it looks like the change I made to the page is incorrect. Thanks for the catch! NtCarlson (talk) 02:31, 2 January 2025 (CET)