Editing Talk:Draconic Resilience

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 4: Line 4:
:Dragonic Resilience is the same as Mage Armour, they both set the base armor to 13 when not wearing an armor. However, Unarmoured Defence "adds" your Constitution Modifier to the base armor when not wearing an armor. This in my opinion should stack. [[User:RYANZKIE|RYANZKIE]] ([[User talk:RYANZKIE|talk]]) 05:47, 13 March 2024 (CET)
:Dragonic Resilience is the same as Mage Armour, they both set the base armor to 13 when not wearing an armor. However, Unarmoured Defence "adds" your Constitution Modifier to the base armor when not wearing an armor. This in my opinion should stack. [[User:RYANZKIE|RYANZKIE]] ([[User talk:RYANZKIE|talk]]) 05:47, 13 March 2024 (CET)
::That's not how it works, Unarmoured Defence doesn't "add AC". Even in tabletop these are different ways of gaining AC, each with their own formula. You can't mix these formulas, only one applies. The D&D rulebook says ''"Some spells and class features give you a different way to calculate your AC. If you have multiple features that give you different ways to calculate your AC, you choose which one to use."'' This was done specifically to avoid stacking, which is part of the whole "bounded accuracy" philosophy in 5e, where all numbers are deliberately kept smaller [[User:Sparkle|Sparkle]] ([[User talk:Sparkle|talk]]) 06:41, 13 March 2024 (CET)
::That's not how it works, Unarmoured Defence doesn't "add AC". Even in tabletop these are different ways of gaining AC, each with their own formula. You can't mix these formulas, only one applies. The D&D rulebook says ''"Some spells and class features give you a different way to calculate your AC. If you have multiple features that give you different ways to calculate your AC, you choose which one to use."'' This was done specifically to avoid stacking, which is part of the whole "bounded accuracy" philosophy in 5e, where all numbers are deliberately kept smaller [[User:Sparkle|Sparkle]] ([[User talk:Sparkle|talk]]) 06:41, 13 March 2024 (CET)
:::It is clear in its definition that it adds modifier to the AC.
:::Description
:::Your body is as resilient as any armour. While not wearing armour, you add your Constitution Modifier to your  Armour Class. Wearing Heavy Armour impedes your Rage.
:::By formula this is simply
:::Base AC + Constitution Modifier
:::In the case of Dragonic Resilience, the formula as per definition is
:::Base AC = 13
:::Tell me if my understanding is wrong. [[User:RYANZKIE|RYANZKIE]] ([[User talk:RYANZKIE|talk]]) 10:24, 13 March 2024 (CET)
::::Here is the code for Draconic Resilience and Unarmoured Defense (Barbarian):
::::{{code|ACOverrideFormula(13,true,Dexterity)}}<br>{{code|ACOverrideFormula(10,true,Dexterity,Constitution)}}<br>The first number is Base Armour Class, the second is if bonuses are allowed (like a shield, spells and enchantments. This is set to false for [[Barkskin]]), and after that any ability modifiers that should be added to the AC. As you can see they both have different formulas and therefore cannot stack.<br>-[[User:Nattern|Nattern]] ([[User talk:Nattern|talk]]) 11:01, 13 March 2024 (CET)
::::RYANZKIE, you're arguing against the rulebook itself, which quite literally states that these are different ways of calculating AC, and that every character only uses ONE formula, and not several formulas mashed together. 
::::I think you're tripped by the word "adds", but that doesn't mean you're free to add a CON modifier to any barbarian's AC, just because he doesn't wear armour. The concept is "base AC + DEX modifier", and different situations define "base AC" differently. When wearing armour, base AC = the AC from the armour. When using Mage Armour, base AC = 13. When Using Draconic Resilience, base AC = 13. When unamoured and a barbarian, base AC = 10 + CON modifier. When unamoured and a monk, base AC = 10 + WIS modifier. So for the barbarian and the monk this base AC is variable and depends on your stats, that's why it says "add CON/WIS modifier", but that doesn't mean you're free to add that to the other formulas. Every case has its definition of base AC and there's no cross pollination, the rulebook says ''"you choose which one to use"''. [[User:Sparkle|Sparkle]] ([[User talk:Sparkle|talk]]) 18:18, 13 March 2024 (CET)
Please note that all contributions to Baldur's Gate 3 Wiki are considered to be released under the CC BY-NC-SA license, except when noted otherwise (see BG3Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited and redistributed at will, do not submit it here. Per our Content Rules, you are promising that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page:

Retrieved from "https://bg3.wiki/wiki/Talk:Draconic_Resilience"