8,856
editsMore actions
→Substantiated Claims
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
:::: I don't see how the wording is claiming there was any actual copulation involved – it's a journal entry playfully invoking a common trope. I agree it should not be in the past sins section, though. It's more relevant for the article of the quest itself, than the Durge page. Discussing edits that have been in place on the wiki for some time before removing them has been the convention for some time. It's not simply for protected pages, of which we only have one (the Style Guide), I believe. In this case, the entries in question were added early in the article's lifespan at the request of another user, and have been around for over a month through several revisions. It is absolutely the policy to discuss (here or on the discord) before removing the entries, then, since they were sourced, and the disagreement was with the interpretation of said source. There has already been previous discussions elsewhere where it was decided the edits should stay. Therefore they should not be removed without further discussion, regardless of our personal opinions. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 20:28, 5 October 2023 (CEST) | :::: I don't see how the wording is claiming there was any actual copulation involved – it's a journal entry playfully invoking a common trope. I agree it should not be in the past sins section, though. It's more relevant for the article of the quest itself, than the Durge page. Discussing edits that have been in place on the wiki for some time before removing them has been the convention for some time. It's not simply for protected pages, of which we only have one (the Style Guide), I believe. In this case, the entries in question were added early in the article's lifespan at the request of another user, and have been around for over a month through several revisions. It is absolutely the policy to discuss (here or on the discord) before removing the entries, then, since they were sourced, and the disagreement was with the interpretation of said source. There has already been previous discussions elsewhere where it was decided the edits should stay. Therefore they should not be removed without further discussion, regardless of our personal opinions. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 20:28, 5 October 2023 (CEST) | ||
:::: Quick edit – I do agree that nothing happened though, I just want to follow the standard protocol that's been used on here for months now. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 21:11, 5 October 2023 (CEST) | |||