168
editsAd placeholder
bg3wiki talk:Ads Announcement 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Why not set up a Patreon or make Kofi more accessible?
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
:::You haven't done much to convince me that this choice wasn't made out of greed. Using your logic, I can claim that I should be paid each time someone looks at a page I had initially created, even if the bulk of the current iteration is provided by other people. That is essentially what you are trying to tell me you are doing, which I, and seemingly several other people, do not agree with. | :::You haven't done much to convince me that this choice wasn't made out of greed. Using your logic, I can claim that I should be paid each time someone looks at a page I had initially created, even if the bulk of the current iteration is provided by other people. That is essentially what you are trying to tell me you are doing, which I, and seemingly several other people, do not agree with. | ||
:::I think the most important part here is broken trust. The issue of broken promises, like you have done here, is a loss of trust. Right now, it's ads. Unintrusive, but ads nonetheless. But what then? Intrusive ads? Autoplaying ads? An eventual devolvement into the same state as Fandom and Fextralife? You can tell us all the time that this won't happen, but we can no longer trust you when you say this is where it'll end. That's what this is about; user trust. Anyone who's been here long enough to contribute meaningfully have been directly betrayed by this new development, as it feels like a bait and switch, and we no longer have any idea if it'll be the first. | :::I think the most important part here is broken trust. The issue of broken promises, like you have done here, is a loss of trust. Right now, it's ads. Unintrusive, but ads nonetheless. But what then? Intrusive ads? Autoplaying ads? An eventual devolvement into the same state as Fandom and Fextralife? You can tell us all the time that this won't happen, but we can no longer trust you when you say this is where it'll end. That's what this is about; user trust. Anyone who's been here long enough to contribute meaningfully have been directly betrayed by this new development, as it feels like a bait and switch, and we no longer have any idea if it'll be the first. | ||
:::Out of all the posts here, only one is positive and giving you | :::Out of all the posts here, only one is positive and giving you consent. Outwardly, nobody agrees with this development either. | ||
:::The important thing is this: It's not that we don't want to trust you. We literally can't. [[User:Schism|Schism]] ([[User talk:Schism|talk]]) 16:58, 29 July 2024 (CEST) | :::The important thing is this: It's not that we don't want to trust you. We literally can't. [[User:Schism|Schism]] ([[User talk:Schism|talk]]) 16:58, 29 July 2024 (CEST) | ||