User talk:Hawkeye: Difference between revisions

User talk:Hawkeye (edit)

296 bytes added , 7 October 2024

23,448

edits

Revision as of 22:09, 6 October 2024 (edit) Rydiak (talk \| contribs) (→‎Everburn Blade magical?: new section) Tags: New topic Source ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:38, 7 October 2024 (edit) (undo) Hawkeye (talk \| contribs) (→‎Everburn Blade magical?: Reply) Tags: Reply Source Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Does Everburn Blade actually ignore the non-magical Slashing resistance that Cambions possess? I thought a weapon required at least a +1 enchantment to be considered a magical source of damage. [[User:Rydiak\|Rydiak]] ([[User talk:Rydiak\|talk]]) 23:09, 6 October 2024 (CEST)		Does Everburn Blade actually ignore the non-magical Slashing resistance that Cambions possess? I thought a weapon required at least a +1 enchantment to be considered a magical source of damage. [[User:Rydiak\|Rydiak]] ([[User talk:Rydiak\|talk]]) 23:09, 6 October 2024 (CEST)

			:I changed this, because the users "Legios against all odds!" and "Natanielxxl5000" found that out. The Evernburn Blade seems to be magical and ignore the slashing resistance even without having a +1 enchantment [[User:Hawkeye\|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye\|talk]]) 09:38, 7 October 2024 (CEST)