6,366
editsAd placeholder
Talk:Guardian of Faith (passive feature): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Guardian of Faith (passive feature) (edit)
Revision as of 14:20, 3 October 2023
, 3 October 2023Edit comment.
(Comment.) |
(Edit comment.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::[https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/937803826583445568/1158751168986628106/image.png?ex=651d629f&is=651c111f&hm=a731da7c271a894780f91504e00f682276b6de53e26664bea37201586da9e980& It does!] At this point we have solid proof that the faded icon is ''Explicitly'' used by the game, and therefore should be on the page. I will make the change once Llama reads this discussion. - [[User:HINK|HINK]] ([[User talk:HINK|talk]]) 15:10, 3 October 2023 (CEST) | ::[https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/937803826583445568/1158751168986628106/image.png?ex=651d629f&is=651c111f&hm=a731da7c271a894780f91504e00f682276b6de53e26664bea37201586da9e980& It does!] At this point we have solid proof that the faded icon is ''Explicitly'' used by the game, and therefore should be on the page. I will make the change once Llama reads this discussion. - [[User:HINK|HINK]] ([[User talk:HINK|talk]]) 15:10, 3 October 2023 (CEST) | ||
::: I would lean towards acting first without necessarily waiting for a read receipt. It seems like an uncontroversial decision now that we have evidence that the transparent version is used by the game itself. -[[User:Sky|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky|talk]]) 15:16, 3 October 2023 (CEST) | ::: I would lean towards acting first without necessarily waiting for a read receipt. It seems like an uncontroversial decision now that we have evidence that the transparent version is used by the game itself. -[[User:Sky|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky|talk]]) 15:16, 3 October 2023 (CEST) | ||
::: Edit: I've done the change. Hopefully this is a satisfactory conclusion for all. | |||