6,366
editsAd placeholder
Talk:The Dark Urge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Comment.
No edit summary |
(Comment.) |
||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:: Added the Elder Brain references back in. While it is definitely playful wording, it is impossible to ignore the obvious reference in the journal. Should probably be rephrased at some point, though. I think the Orin dialogue can be removed, mainly because while the incestuous undertones are definitely there, the fact is that Orin also acts like that with everybody. In the future, it's best to start the discussion on talk page before removing information. If no one engages for a while, it is probably ok to remove it. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 19:18, 5 October 2023 (CEST) | :: Added the Elder Brain references back in. While it is definitely playful wording, it is impossible to ignore the obvious reference in the journal. Should probably be rephrased at some point, though. I think the Orin dialogue can be removed, mainly because while the incestuous undertones are definitely there, the fact is that Orin also acts like that with everybody. In the future, it's best to start the discussion on talk page before removing information. If no one engages for a while, it is probably ok to remove it. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 19:18, 5 October 2023 (CEST) | ||
:: Edit: I rephrased the part about the Elder Brain again, but I'm still not satisfied with it. Hmm ... [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 19:21, 5 October 2023 (CEST) | |||
:::: I don't feel like it's correct to leave that fact under "past sins" at all... the other two past sins have very solid evidence while the only evidence for hot slimy tentacle sex is a vague insinuation by a non-diegetic source -- the quest journal isn't written ''by'' anyone. It seems like the ''actual'' interactions with the Elder Brain suggest no tentacle sex occurred. | |||
:::: I also disagree with the "discussion before removing information" when the information in question was reasonably thought to have been inaccurate. I think remove-plus-talk-page is a good combo. "Discuss before remove" is more of a policy for protected/controversial pages rather than the norm. Ofc, the dark urge page might in the future be controversial enough to protect, but at the moment that doesn't see to be the case! - [[User:Sky|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky|talk]]) 19:26, 5 October 2023 (CEST) | |||