Talk:Damage: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 18 January by Nattern in topic Missing 1d8
(→Missing 1d8: new section) |
(Resolved issue) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Suggested edit: | Suggested edit: | ||
However, the average roll of 2d4 is 5 damage, while the average roll of '''<1d8>''' is only 4.5, because 2d4 can never roll a 1. Therefore, 2d4 is generally more consistent in damage output and will result in higher rolls in the long run. | However, the average roll of 2d4 is 5 damage, while the average roll of '''<1d8>''' is only 4.5, because 2d4 can never roll a 1. Therefore, 2d4 is generally more consistent in damage output and will result in higher rolls in the long run. | ||
* Added, thank you [[User:Nattern|Nattern]] ([[User talk:Nattern|talk]]) 08:14, 18 January 2024 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 09:14, 18 January 2024
Missing 1d8
Current version: However, the average roll of 2d4 is 5 damage, while the average roll of is only 4.5, because 2d4 can never roll a 1. Therefore, 2d4 is generally more consistent in damage output and will result in higher rolls in the long run.
Suggested edit: However, the average roll of 2d4 is 5 damage, while the average roll of <1d8> is only 4.5, because 2d4 can never roll a 1. Therefore, 2d4 is generally more consistent in damage output and will result in higher rolls in the long run.