User talk:Arikel

Astarion Romance Page

Hi Arikel!

First off, thank you for all the edits you've been doing!

You might have noticed us locking the Astarion/Romance & Gale/Romance page while we are looking into the discussion on the talk page & the back and forth editing taking place. We always strive to have Accuracy before anything else and to have our articles written objectively and neutral, as outlined in our bg3wiki:Editing policy. Personal opinions should never influence the content of a wiki.

We noticed a couple of instances where your edits did not line up with our goals. We want to encourage you to take another read of Help:Style manual & Help:Editing Policy and be mindful of how future edits sound.

This is NOT supposed to discourage you from continuing your edits - you have been putting in great work!

In cases of extreme disagreement or extended discussion, you are encouraged and more then welcome to reach out to the Moderators & Maintainers (ideally via the Discord) to resolve those situations.

(Just FYI, the page might stay locked a little while longer while additional team members give it a read.)

If you have any questions, dont hesitate to reach out via my Talk Page or via the bg3.wiki Discord server! Valk (talk) 00:32, 20 July 2024 (CEST)

Hi,

Thank you for noticing the 'carousel' with editing the page, and sorry for opening a Pandora's box there. It was caused mostly by the previous contributor simply deleting ALL of my contribute and leaving rather personal and spiteful comment (like a proposal to visit a therapyst, for instance) on the Talk page.

In the future, I will try to stick closer to neutrality and general style of editing articles.

Thank you for blocking the edit possibility for the page in question, this would bide all of concerned contributors some time to cool down a little.

However, there are some issues that IMO should be restored/altered from previous edit, which I'd like you to consider:

1) The clause of NPC maintaining the relations without long-rests is now doubled (in the beginning and in the end of the Romance conclusion section)

2) The description of the dialogue on the next morning remained in the 'spawn' section, but has been totally deleted in 'ascended' section, whatever its formulation should be

3) The necessity of the link to FRWiki is doubtful, because the article there is a stub derived from materials taken from our wiki and directly from the game.

Also, I'd like you to pay some attention to several users that were created recently, specifically to leave a couple of comments on the cause an the correspondent Talk page. Their comments towards my edits contain certain insult-like phrases (mentioned above and some other). If it is possible, I'd ask you to delete all the long-reads at the Talk page.

Thank you in advance Arikel (talk) 07:33, 20 July 2024 (CEST)

Thank you for understanding!

I'll look into the points you mentioned, only did the first round yesterday ^^

I'll also see what I can do about the talk page Valk (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2024 (CEST)

Approval Page additions

I just wanted to extend a massive thank you for all of the hard work you’ve done (and continue to do) on the companion approval pages. Varixai (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2024 (CET)

Thank you, sincerely. At least these are more useful than Banter pages. I just hope to finish updating it to P7 before P8 is brought forth Arikel (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2024 (CET)