Template talk:Spell page: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 32: Line 32:
: It looks like Monks use a separate list of spells and they aren't really spells (they don't have a School or Level) so we shouldn't be using SpellPage for them.  We need a separate template for the various kinds of class-specific actions that expend class-specific resources: Arcane Recovery Charges, Bardic Inspiration, Channel Divinity, Channel Oath, Ki Points, Rage Charges, Sorcery Points, Superiority Dice, and Wild Shape Charges.  (Warlock Spell Slots aren't mentioned as a separate thing because they function as regular spell slots in every way except that they recover on a Short Rest.)
: It looks like Monks use a separate list of spells and they aren't really spells (they don't have a School or Level) so we shouldn't be using SpellPage for them.  We need a separate template for the various kinds of class-specific actions that expend class-specific resources: Arcane Recovery Charges, Bardic Inspiration, Channel Divinity, Channel Oath, Ki Points, Rage Charges, Sorcery Points, Superiority Dice, and Wild Shape Charges.  (Warlock Spell Slots aren't mentioned as a separate thing because they function as regular spell slots in every way except that they recover on a Short Rest.)
: That being said, if we notice that there's a ton of overlap in the way the SpellPage template and the class-specific actions template are implemented, we could merge them into one template.  (We're already about to expand this template to be able to handle item-specific and NPC-specific spells, some of which don't expend spell slots for example.  But for now it will be limited to things that at least have a School and Level and as such are still spells in a sense.)  I'd like to see someone finish the implementation of that template first, without thinking too much about compatibility, and then we should see if the compatibility comes naturally. [[User:Taylan|Taylan]] ([[User talk:Taylan|talk]]) 19:47, 4 September 2023 (CEST)
: That being said, if we notice that there's a ton of overlap in the way the SpellPage template and the class-specific actions template are implemented, we could merge them into one template.  (We're already about to expand this template to be able to handle item-specific and NPC-specific spells, some of which don't expend spell slots for example.  But for now it will be limited to things that at least have a School and Level and as such are still spells in a sense.)  I'd like to see someone finish the implementation of that template first, without thinking too much about compatibility, and then we should see if the compatibility comes naturally. [[User:Taylan|Taylan]] ([[User talk:Taylan|talk]]) 19:47, 4 September 2023 (CEST)
Fair Enough - I removed my changes to the spells page as for monk stuff since we aren't considering those spells per se.
class-specific actions template would be nice but i think the guy said he didn't have enough time or something. It really needs to be done lol as currently it is messy divs clears and a bunch of other messy syntax. [[User:MetalPlateMage|MetalPlateMage]] ([[User talk:MetalPlateMage|talk]]) 20:06, 4 September 2023 (CEST)

Navigation menu