The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
: That's exactly what looks like is happening. The different stages of Synaptic Consumption are implemented as separate effects, {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_1}} through {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_5}}. As you might imagine, {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_1}} decreases all ability scores by 5 and {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_2}} decreases all ability scores by 6. The problem is, they do not share a [[Stack ID]] and hence stack with each other rather than {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_2}} replacing {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_1}}. The end result is -11 to all ability scores by the start of turn 2. β [[User:NtCarlson|NtCarlson]] ([[User talk:NtCarlson|talk]]) 03:41, 8 February 2024 (CET) | : That's exactly what looks like is happening. The different stages of Synaptic Consumption are implemented as separate effects, {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_1}} through {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_5}}. As you might imagine, {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_1}} decreases all ability scores by 5 and {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_2}} decreases all ability scores by 6. The problem is, they do not share a [[Stack ID]] and hence stack with each other rather than {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_2}} replacing {{c|MF_ABSORB_INTELLECT_1}}. The end result is -11 to all ability scores by the start of turn 2. β [[User:NtCarlson|NtCarlson]] ([[User talk:NtCarlson|talk]]) 03:41, 8 February 2024 (CET) | ||