Help talk:Style manual: Difference between revisions
Llamageddon (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(→Linking Guidance: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Update to say. *Emerald Grove*/*Emerald Enclave*/*Druid's Grove* references should just be excised as examples IMO. Wasn't aware before, but I think the whole page(s) were moved/renamed. May be me who is incorrect, but wanted to be sure to clarify concerns, after previous comment. [[User:Llamageddon|Llamageddon]] ([[User talk:Llamageddon|talk]]) 18:41, 23 August 2023 (CEST) | :Update to say. *Emerald Grove*/*Emerald Enclave*/*Druid's Grove* references should just be excised as examples IMO. Wasn't aware before, but I think the whole page(s) were moved/renamed. May be me who is incorrect, but wanted to be sure to clarify concerns, after previous comment. [[User:Llamageddon|Llamageddon]] ([[User talk:Llamageddon|talk]]) 18:41, 23 August 2023 (CEST) | ||
== Linking Guidance == | |||
Hi everyone. I was wondering if I could get a bit clearer guidance on the frequency of linking to the same pages on an article? | |||
My general sense has been to link only the first instance of a page referenced in an article, unless the link is very important, and the references are spread out within a dense article. But then, I've seen people link many instances of the same page, sometimes in quick succession, such as this example I've created: | |||
"[[Astarion]] is an [[Elf]] [[Rogue]]. In [[Act One]], [[Astarion]] can be recruited. [[Astarion]] is from [[Baldur's Gate]]. Players can romance [[Astarion]] in the game by increasing his [[approval]] rating. There is a [[companion]] [[quest]] in [[Act One]] for [[Astarion]] that can be completed in [[Act Three]]." | |||
This feels like it interferes with readability. My understanding is this would be considered overlinking (at least by Wikipedia's standards) and would make more sense like this: | |||
"[[Astarion]] is an [[Elf]] [[Rogue]]. In [[Act One]], Astarion can be recruited. Astarion is from [[Baldur's Gate]]. Players can romance Astarion in the game by increasing his [[approval]] rating. There is a [[The Pale Elf|companion quest]] in Act One for Astarion that can be completed in [[Act Three]]." | |||
Can I get some guidance on which we're meant to be doing? Thanks for any help y'all can give. - [[User:Reve|Reve]] ([[User talk:Reve|talk]]) 02:59, 10 September 2023 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 01:59, 10 September 2023
Assuming style guide should be corrected ASAP if linking to outdated or incorrect wiki pages:
Possibly quite high-priority edit I can't correct. Highly likely that, regardless of terminology, Silvanus' Grove should not be linked in Locations. Been looking into it, don't think it was written with a release version of game as reference. [[Emerald Enclave], corrected due to previous wording, *does* now work with the new rewording, and is a good example.
Seemed important to draw attention for correction. Apologies if talk page use here unorthodox. Llamageddon (talk) 18:26, 23 August 2023 (CEST)
- Update to say. *Emerald Grove*/*Emerald Enclave*/*Druid's Grove* references should just be excised as examples IMO. Wasn't aware before, but I think the whole page(s) were moved/renamed. May be me who is incorrect, but wanted to be sure to clarify concerns, after previous comment. Llamageddon (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2023 (CEST)
Linking Guidance
Hi everyone. I was wondering if I could get a bit clearer guidance on the frequency of linking to the same pages on an article?
My general sense has been to link only the first instance of a page referenced in an article, unless the link is very important, and the references are spread out within a dense article. But then, I've seen people link many instances of the same page, sometimes in quick succession, such as this example I've created:
"Astarion is an Elf Rogue. In Act One, Astarion can be recruited. Astarion is from Baldur's Gate. Players can romance Astarion in the game by increasing his approval rating. There is a companion quest in Act One for Astarion that can be completed in Act Three."
This feels like it interferes with readability. My understanding is this would be considered overlinking (at least by Wikipedia's standards) and would make more sense like this:
"Astarion is an Elf Rogue. In Act One, Astarion can be recruited. Astarion is from Baldur's Gate. Players can romance Astarion in the game by increasing his approval rating. There is a companion quest in Act One for Astarion that can be completed in Act Three."
Can I get some guidance on which we're meant to be doing? Thanks for any help y'all can give. - Reve (talk) 02:59, 10 September 2023 (CEST)